



0. Introduction. 1. Zplane operations. 2. Series reactance and resistance. 3. Parallel impedance. 4. Admittance, conductance, susceptance. 5. Equation of a circle. 
6. Parallel resistance (constant B). 7. Parallel reactance (constant G) . 8. Transformers (constant φ) 9. Impedance matching strategies. 10. Zplane regions. Part 2 >>> . 
Introduction: Having shown in previous chapters how an antenna system can be reduced to a twoterminal network and considered simply as an impedance; we now look at the impedance matching process. In chapter 1 it was shown how an impedance can be brought to resonance by means of a conjugate series reactance, and thereby converted into a pure resistance. The full impedance matching process however, is a twostep operation, which involves both reactance cancellation and resistance transformation; the object of the exercise being to convert an arbitrary impedance to a specific desired value of resistance. The usual target resistance value is 50Ω, which is the preferred load resistance for modern transistor power amplifiers and also an entirely suitable load resistance for most valve (tube) amplifiers. The information that follows however, is readily adaptable to target resistances other than 50Ω. Impedance matching is, of course, carried out by means of an antenna matching unit or 'antenna tuner' ('AMU' or 'ATU'). It must be stressed however, that the type of antenna tuner under discussion is not the type that is often builtin to a transceiver. A typical 'builtin' ATU in a modern transistor transceiver might have a matching range of about 17 to 150Ω resistive, and about ±300Ω reactive. This is sufficient to make a coaxfed resonant antenna usable over a whole amateur band, and is also useful for matching the input impedance of a valve (tube) linear amplifier (which is unlikely to be exactly 50Ω), but is entirely inadequate for matching the vast range of input impedances that can be presented by a generalcoverage HF antenna system. Likewise, the output πcoupler of a valve amplifier is likely to have a restricted matching range, and may not give adequate harmonic attenuation when used to match loads vastly different from 50+j0 Ω. The antenna tuners of interest here therefore are what might be called 'fullrange' matching networks, i.e., tuners with a range of about 3 to 3000Ω resistive and ±2500Ω reactive. The adjustment procedures for common antenna tuners will be discussed later in this chapter; but first we will lay the basis for an understanding of such procedures by examining the effects of the electrical components involved. Antenna tuner adjustment is usually carried out with the aid of an SWR meter; but as we shall see, SWR is not the best quantity to monitor during the adjustment phase, and an alternative measuring bridge, not much more complicated than an SWR bridge, can lead the operator directly to the most efficient matching solution for a given type of matching network. 
1. ZPlane Operations: The impedance matching process is best considered as a set of operations in the impedance plane, or Zplane. The Zplane is simply a graph of R against jX on which a given impedance can be plotted as a point. The Zplane therefore corresponds to a mathematical space; impedance space, in which all impedances can be considered to lie. A matching network can be regarded as a toolkit of components that can be combined with an impedance in some fashion in order to move the resultant impedance to a new position in the Zplane.To represent this process, we will use the notation: Z → Z' which is pronounced: "Z goes to Z prime", or "Z tends towards Z prime". The prime (single apostrophe) symbol is generally used to indicate modification, i.e., Z' is different from Z but is related to it because it results from an operation performed on Z. In general, impedance matching is a matter of manipulating the point Z by the addition of some combination of transformers and series and parallel impedances. In practice, for reasons of efficiency, and especially in the case where the impedance to be matched is an antenna system; the manipulation is performed using only high Q coils and capacitors, and any transformers used should preferably be of the transmissionline variety. 
2. Series Reactance and Resistance: The simplest operation that can be carried out on an impedance is to place a resistance or reactance in series with it. As was discussed in chapter 1; if a pure resistance is placed in series with an impedance Z, it simply adds to the Rpart of Z without affecting the Xpart. If a pure reactance is placed in series with Z it adds to the Xpart without affecting the Rpart. Thus if an impedance Z=R+jX has a reactance XS placed in series with it, the new impedance is Z'=R+j(X+XS). If Z has a resistance RS placed in series with it, then Z'=(R+RS) +jX. The effect of these operations in impedance space is shown below: 
Note that while we can only add resistance (so moving
Z to the right), we can add or subtract reactance, because
inductors and capacitors have opposite effects, and so move freely
up or down in the vertical direction. Vertical lines in the Zplane
(i.e., parallel to the jX axis) are known as lines
of constant resistance. Horizontal lines (parallel to
the R axis) are known as lines of constant reactance. Note that if an inductor is used, increasing L (and hence XL) moves Z' upwards. If a capacitor is used however, reducing C (increasing the magnitude of Xc) moves the Z' downwards, i.e., a series capacitor must be initially large to have no effect, and its effect increases as its capacitance is reduced. Resistance, of course, is not normally used for antenna matching purposes; but in situations where a moderate loss of power is acceptable or desirable, such as in matching the input impedance of a linear amplifier, there may be reason to include it in the matching network. Understanding the effect of resistance is also important for an understanding of the effect of practical components, particularly inductors, which often have substantial loss resistance at radio frequencies. 
3. Parallel Impedance: In [AC Theory, Section 14] a demonstration was given of what might be called the 'bruteforce' solution to the problem of finding out what happens when impedances are connected in parallel. The resulting expression is shown below for an impedance Zp=Rp+jXp placed in parallel with an initial impedance Z=R+jX, i.e., it is the expansion of the parallel impedance formula Z'=ZZp/(Z+Zp). 

This equation, while possessing a certain symmetry, offers a version of what is happening that is extremely difficult to visualise; and even hardened mathematicians like to think in pictures. There is a better way of looking at the problem, which involves redefining it in terms of the reciprocal of impedance, i.e., 1/Z, this quantity being known as admittance. This alternative approach (which is the basis of the Smith chart) does not particularly simplify the expressions we need to use when writing computer programs or performing spreadsheet analyses, but it scores on two major points: it allows us to view the parallel impedance problem as a simple matter of addition, and it allows a straightforward graphical way of visualising the effect of placing a resistance or a reactance in parallel with an impedance. 
4. Admittance, Conductance, Susceptance. The subject of admittance was introduced in [AC Theory, section 44]. There we defined admittance as Y=1/Z, where, as usual, Z=R+jX. From this we obtained the relationship: Y = (R  jX) / (R² + X²) which can be written Y = G + jB where the real part of the admittance, G, is called the conductance, and the imaginary part of the admittance, B, is called the susceptance (of the network under consideration). Hence the definitions for conductance and susceptance are: G = R / (R² + X² ) B = X / (R² + X² ) Now observe that if a network is purely resistive, it has no susceptance, i.e., Y=G+j0. Consequently, if we place a pure resistance Rp (with Gp=1/Rp) in parallel with an impedance Z (with Y=1/Z) the resultant admittance is given by: Y' = ( G + Gp ) + jB. This means that, provided that it is greater than zero (i.e., not a shortcircuit), a parallel resistance cannot alter the original value of susceptance. The resultant impedance is therefore constrained to follow a path of constant susceptance as the parallel resistance is varied. Similarly, if a network is purely reactive, it has no conductance, i.e., Y=0+jB. Consequently, if we place a pure (non zero) reactance Xp (with Bp=1/Xp) in parallel with an impedance, the modified admittance is: Y' = G + j( B + Bp ) Which indicates that the parallel reactance cannot alter the original value of conductance, and the resultant impedance must therefore be constrained to lie on a path of constant conductance. It transpires that when susceptance or conductance is held constant, the path on which an impedance is constrained to lie takes on a very simple form. The curve in question was no doubt discovered (many years ago) by someone who plotted a graph of it the hard way (using the parallel impedance equation) and became suspicious of the shape. Here we will preempt the discovery, by exploring the properties of the simplest object that can be drawn using a pair of compasses. 
5. The Equation of a Circle. 
The diagram above shows a circle of radius r, with its centre
C placed arbitrarily at a point (Ro,
Xo). In order to produce an equation for
this circle (an hence any circle), all we have to do is write
an expression for the radius that is true regardless of how we
measure it; i.e., regardless of where we put the point Z
from which the distance from C to Z (the radius)
is measured. Since r is the hypotenuse of a triangle with sides
XXo and RRo,
the equation is given by Pythagoras' theorem, i.e.:

6. Parallel Resistance: Earlier in this article, from a derivation given in [AC Theory, Section 14], a general expression was given for the impedance that results when two impedances are placed in parallel. If one of the impedances is purely resistive, the expression reduces to: 


where Z' is the impedance that results when an initial
impedance Z=R+jX is modified by the connection
of a parallel resistance Rp. Notice that
when Rp becomes extremely large, the Rp² term in the denominator becomes dominant
(i.e., much larger than anything else) and so only terms in the
numerator that contain Rp² can survive
being divided by the denominator without vanishing. Thus as R→∞,
Z'→R+jX. Common sense also tells us that when
Rp=0, the resulting impedance is a dead
short, i.e., Z'=0+j0. The effect of a resistance Rp in parallel with an impedance Z=R+jX can also be considered as the effect of a conductance Gp=1/Rp in parallel with an admittance Y=G+jB, in which case: Y' = G + Gp +jB. Since the susceptance B=X/(R²+X²) is completely defined by the original impedance, it remains constant regardless of the value of Rp. Therefore we may also write: B = B' = X' /( R'² + X'² ) i.e., the new susceptance is the same as the old susceptance. This equation may be rewritten:
Compare this with the general equation of a circleof radius r with its centre at Ro,Xo (with the variables changed to X' and R' to suit the current problem): R'² + X'² 2R'Ro 2X'Xo + Ro² + Xo²  r² = 0 Note that in expression (6.2) there is no term equivalent to 2R'Ro, and so Ro must be zero; which means that the centre of the circle lies on the X axis. This reduces the circle equation to: R'² + X'² 2X'Xo + Xo²  r² = 0 There are no terms equivalent to Xo²r², therefore Xo²=r², therefore Xo=±r. The circle just grazes the point R=0, X=0. Finally, we may equate 2X'Xo=X'/B, i.e., Xo=1/(2B). Therefore the centre of the circle lies at Ro=0, Xo=±1/(2B) (there being two alternatives depending on the sign of X in the original impedance), and the radius is 1/(2B). The conclusion is that when a resistance Rp is placed in parallel with an impedance Z=R+jX, the resultant impedance Z' moves on a circle, which has its centre at 0j/(2B), and a radius of 1/(2B), where B=X/(R²+X²). Z' is constrained to lie between the original impedance R+jX and 0+j0, and since R is always positive in conventionally defined impedance problems, the curve is only part of a circle (an arc) and so is called an arc of constant susceptance. 
In the diagram above, the curve is shown for positive X (and
hence negative B). If X is negative, the curve has the same shape
but is reflected about the R axis. Note that if X is greater
than R, reducing the parallel resistance can actually cause the
resistive component of the resultant impedance (R') to increase
to a maximum of 1/(2B) when X'=±j/(2B). The effect
of Rp however, is always to reduce the
load phase angle, i.e., it has the effect of swamping the reactance,
but it can never bring the phase angle to zero except at 0+j0. To give an idea of the rate at which Z changes as the parallel resistance is reduced, the table on the right shows computed values of R' and X' for various values of parallel resistance, Rp, connected across an initial impedance of 100+j100 Ω. Equation (6.1) was used for the calculation. Notice, in this instance, that the parallel resistance has little effect on the resistive component of the resultant impedance, R', provided that it is about 10 or more times greater than the initial resistive component R. In general, when the initial reactance X is large in comparison to R, parallel resistance has a stronger effect on X' than it does on R', but this is no longer true when X is small. 

7. Parallel Reactance: In the case of an impedance shunted by a pure reactance, the general expression for impedances in parallel reduces to: 


where Z' is the impedance that results when an initial
impedance Z=R+jX is modified by the connection
of a parallel reactance Xp. Notice that
when the magnitude of Xp (i.e., its value
regardless of sign) is infinite, then only terms in the numerator
containing Xp² can survive being
divided by the denominator, and the expression reduces to Z'=R+jX.
Also, when Xp=0, i.e., when the initial
impedance is shunted by a very small inductance or a very large
capacitance, then Z'→0+j0. The effect of a reactance Xp in parallel with an impedance Z=R+jX can also be considered as the effect of a susceptance Bp=1/Xp in paralell with an admittance Y=G+jB, in which case: Y' = G +j(B + Bp) Since the conductance G=R/(R²+X²) is defined by the original impedance, it remains constant regardless of the value of Xp. Therefore we may also write: G = G' = R' /( R'² + X'² ) i.e., the new conductance is the same as the old conductance. This equation may be rewritten:
Compare this with the general equation of a circleof radius r with its centre at Ro,Xo: R'² + X'² 2R'Ro 2X'Xo + Ro² + Xo²  r² = 0 Equation (7.2) has no terms equivalent to 2X'Xo, and so Xo=0. The centre of the circle lies on the R axis. The circle equation is therefore reduced to: R'² + X'² 2R'Ro + Ro²  r² = 0 Equation (7.2) has no terms equivalent to Ro²r², therefore Ro=r (strictly, Ro=±r, but here we will confine our analysis to positive resistances). The circle just grazes zero. Finally we may equate 2R'Ro=R'/G, i.e., Ro=1/(2G). The centre of the circle lies at Ro=1/(2G), Xo=0, and its radius is 1/(2G). Thus we conclude that the effect of adding reactance in parallel with an impedance is to move the point Z' around a circular path. The circle so described has its centre on the R axis at [1/(2G)]+j0, just touches the origin of the graph (0+j0), and is known as a circle of constant conductance. 
The direction of rotation in the Zplane is clockwise when a capacitor is connected across Z and anticlockwise when an inductor is connected across Z. The effect of a parallel reactance is least when the reactance is at its highest value, and increases at the reactance is reduced. Consequently, if a variable capacitor is used, increasing its capacitance (reducing Xc) moves the resultant Z in a clockwise direction; and if a variable inductor is used, reducing its inductance (reducing XL) moves the point Z in an anticlockwise direction. Note that the point 0+j0 is only approached if the parallel capacitance becomes infinite (Xc→0), or the parallel inductance goes to zero (XL→0), both situations corresponding to an effective shortcircuit. 
8. Transformers: 
In [AC Theory, Section 41], it was shown that the effect of a tightly coupled conventional transformer, to a good first approximation at least, is to carry out an impedance transformation according to the square of the turns ratio. 

Z' = ( Np / Ns
)² Z Thus a transformer scales the load impedance by a factor (Np/Ns)², where Np is the number of turns in the primary winding, and Ns is the number of turns in the secondary winding. This operation moves the resultant impedance Z' along a line starting at 0+j0 and passing through the original impedance Z. The transformer modifies the magnitude of the impedance but leaves the phase angle φ unchanged, thus the resultant impedance is constrained to lie on a line of constant phase. 
This type of transformation can be achieved using both conventional
and transmissionline transformers; but transmissionline transformers
are to be preferred on the grounds of efficiency, bandwidth,
and freedom from coresaturation effects. Any transformer included
in a matching unit will also normally carry out a balanced to
unbalanced load transformation if required, i.e., the transformer
is also the balun. Dr Jerry Sevick, W2FMI (see references [1]  [4]) has described highly efficient wideband toroidal cored baluns and ununs, with impedance ratios of 1:1, 4:1, 9:1 and 16:1 (i.e., turns ratios of 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1), and slightly less efficient intermediate ratios. When driving a centrefed wire antenna, a 1:1 balun is normally used, but other ratios can be convenient for shifting awkward impedances into different parts of the Zplane. 
9. Impedance Matching Strategies: From the above, it can be deduced that the process of matching an impedance to (say) 50Ω without introducing unnecessary losses, is a matter of manipulating the transmitter (generator) load Z' on to the point 50+j0 by moving it along lines of constant resistance and around circles of constant conductance. A switchable transformer gives the added possibility of moving Z' along a line of constant phase. All of the possible operations not involving resistance are summarised in the diagram below: 
Thus we are free to move anywhere in the Zplane, but constrained in terms of the paths that can be taken. In order to workout which operations should be used, we can consider the problem backwards by observing the attributes of the target impedance, i.e., 50+j0 Ω: 
The first point to note is that the target impedance, 50+j0
Ω, lies on the 50Ω constant resistance line. An initial
impedance Z that does not lie on this line can always
be brought on to it by moving it around a circle of constant
conductance, i.e., by placing a reactance in parallel with it.
An intermediate impedance that lies on this line can always be
brought to 50+j0 by placing a reactance in series with
it. Therefore impedance matching can always (in principle) be
carried out in a twostep operation. The constant conductance circle on which 50+j0 Ω lies is known as the 20mS constant conductance circle (i.e., 20 milliSiemens or 1/50 Siemens). Its radius 1/2G=25Ω, and its centre lies at the point 25+j0 Ω. It crosses the resistance axis at 0 and at 1/G=50Ω. If an initial impedance has a resistive component of less than 50Ω, it can always be manipulated onto the 20mS constant conductance circle by placing a reactance in series with it. An intermediate impedance that lies on the 20mS circle can then always be brought to 50+j0 by placing a reactance in parallel with it. 
10. ZPlane Regions: The diagram below shows six regions of the Zplane, identified according to their relationship to the target impedance 50+j0. It also shows some of the matching networks that give the shortest possible route to Z=50+j0. The encircled numbers indicate the operations that must be performed, the order in which to perform them, and their effects. It is assumed that parallel reactances are initially set to their highest possible values (effective open circuit), and series reactances are initially set to their lowest possible values (effective short circuit). 
The diagram immediately shows why controversies exist over the
choice of best general purpose matching network. The reason is
that there isn't one. All of the popular matching networks will
do the job however, provided that there is sufficient adjustment
to force the initial impedance into a different region. For example,
region E might be a job for a Tmatch tuner with the antennaside
capacitor set to maximum. If we must use a πmatch however,
we can use the loadside capacitor to swing the impedance around
through region F and then on to hit the 50Ω line
on the jX side. The required strategies for matching
any impedance with various popular types of AMU will be discussed
in detail shortly. The network for region D incidentally,
indicates that an antenna presenting an impedance in this zone
may be used with a series loading coil. This should not be surprising
given that region D is associated with electrically short
antennas. Not shown on the diagram is the fact that a stepdown transformer can be used to shift impedances A and B into region E, and impedances C and D into region F; i.e., for an antenna system, the input impedance of which varies widely with frequency, knowledge of the Zplane region is helpful in determining when to use a transformer, or more particularly, when to substitute a 1:1 balun or unun for one of a different ratio. As mentioned previously, in the case of antennas for amateur radio use, the standard diagnostic for adjustment of the matching network is the SWR meter. This should be used in conjunction with an antenna ammeter, or a fieldstrength meter, but in many cases is not. The problem with the SWR meter is that it can tell the operator when the point Z=50+j0 has been reached, but it gives no indication of how to do so. Also, in the absence of information about how much energy is being transmitted through the AMU, there is the very real possibility with some types of matching network, that nearly all of the transmitter output will be delivered inadvertently to the loss resistance of the inductor. A straw poll of HF radio operators will reveal that most claim to have matching adjustment strategies that work for them, but that no single procedure emerges as the best method. There is a very good reason for that, which can be identified from the preceding information; the point being that the optimum adjustment strategy depends on the region of the Zplane in which the load impedance lies. If we can determine the Zplane region, we can immediately determine the adjustment that gives the shortest (and therefore, arguably, the most efficient) route to the desired matching point. It should be obvious by now, that the ability to assign a load impedance to a region of the Zplane will greatly assist the matching process. How to do so becomes clear when the electrical attributes of the six regions are tabulated thus: 




























The table and diagram above indicate that the Zplane region
can be determined by the use of three detectors: 1) A Resistance bridge balanced to give a a null output when R=50Ω. 2) A Reactance bridge (i.e., a phase bridge) balanced to give a null output when jX=0. 3) A Conductance bridge balanced to give a null output when G=20mS. The chosen nulling values can of course be modified for target impedances other than 50+j0. The unambiguous maching procedure using null measurements of R, G and φ was first proposed in 1973 by Mike Underhill (G3LHZ) and Peter Lewis of Mullard (Philips) research laboratories [9]. The required bridges can be constructed using substantially the same components as an SWR bridge; i.e., if an SWR meter is to be included in an AMU, the addition of a rotary switch and a centrezero meter will permit the additional measurements to be made. A suitable instrument can also be made for insertion in the line between the transmitter and the AMU or antenna. This device we have called a "Match Meter". The original Match Meter is described in an appendix [M50], and the underlying theory is developed in [6.5]. The type of information obtainable from a Match Meter incidentally, is not quite the same as the information provided by a lowcost antenna analyser such as the MFJ259 or 269; and a Match Meter is considerably more ergonomic in its intended application. In particular, if an analyser is used, calculation is required in order to find where the load lies in relation to the 20mS constant conductance circle, and the analyser has a limited reactance range and does not give the sign of the reactance directly. The Match Meter bridges belong to a class here referred to as "magnitude difference bridges" (MDBs), which indicate whether a particular attribute of a randomly encountered impedance is above or below the target value. 



